From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6140E1F5AE for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239670AbhDWO2C (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:28:02 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:33422 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231220AbhDWO2C (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:28:02 -0400 Received: (qmail 7517 invoked by uid 109); 23 Apr 2021 14:27:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 14:27:25 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 8994 invoked by uid 111); 23 Apr 2021 14:27:24 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:27:24 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:27:24 -0400 From: Jeff King To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] object-store.h: move read_loose_object() below 'struct object_info' Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:43:07AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Move the definition of read_loose_object() below "struct > object_info". In the next commit we'll add a "struct object_info *" > parameter to it, moving it will avoid a forward declaration of the > struct. This is a declaration, not a definition, no? Not a huge deal, I just expected to see the function body moving when I read the patch, but didn't. -Peff