From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866271F4B4 for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 15:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233038AbhDIPle (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:41:34 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:46304 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232796AbhDIPld (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:41:33 -0400 Received: (qmail 31769 invoked by uid 109); 9 Apr 2021 15:41:20 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:41:20 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 12475 invoked by uid 111); 9 Apr 2021 15:41:20 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 09 Apr 2021 11:41:20 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:41:19 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] config: allow overriding global/system config Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 03:43:16PM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > Instead of going for GIT_CONFIG_NOGLOBAL, I've adopted Junio's proposal > of going with GIT_CONFIG_GLOBAL and GIT_CONFIG_SYSTEM, which allow a > user to modify the locations of those files. Thanks for the discussion, > this solution feels a lot nicer to me! Thanks, I like this much better. I left a few comments on the patches themselves. Mostly small suggestions, but design-wise I'm of the opinion we should drop the "file must exist" requirement; see the response to patch 3. -Peff