From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5C01F5AF for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235749AbhC2JRB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 05:17:01 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:35220 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233157AbhC2JQ6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 05:16:58 -0400 Received: (qmail 9527 invoked by uid 109); 29 Mar 2021 09:16:56 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:16:56 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 11573 invoked by uid 111); 29 Mar 2021 09:16:57 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 05:16:57 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 05:16:55 -0400 From: Jeff King To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Taylor Blau , Elijah Newren , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] object tests: add test for unexpected objects in tags Message-ID: References: <20210308200426.21824-7-avarab@gmail.com> <87h7kwnjpp.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <8735wfnv7i.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8735wfnv7i.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 05:39:45PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > > I thought the "blind spot" you meant was not testing these cases. But I > > guess you mean that we are not checking stderr. > > > > So OK, but... > > Ah yes. I'll clarify that. I thought it was clear since the series is > about the output we emit on errors, not the rev-list traversal itself. TBH, I think it was as much a reading comprehension fail on my part. But it certainly doesn't hurt to make the commit message more clear. -Peff