From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686251F4B4 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232168AbhDGVSo (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:18:44 -0400 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:43784 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232151AbhDGVSm (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:18:42 -0400 Received: (qmail 18016 invoked by uid 109); 7 Apr 2021 21:18:30 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 21:18:30 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 23205 invoked by uid 111); 7 Apr 2021 21:18:30 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 07 Apr 2021 17:18:30 -0400 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 17:18:29 -0400 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Bagas Sanjaya , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reviewed-by given by celebrities (no subject matter expertise on Git development) Message-ID: References: <345a7b27-8ee4-4b64-0340-40b002a25d1f@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 01:57:10PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > I don't usually post "me too" responses, since they are usually just > > noise. But I could not resist it here, for two reasons: > > > > - this is such a nicely written summary of what "Reviewed-by" means in > > our project that I think it deserves some praise. :) > > > > - because it is ultimately about "what does Reviewed-by mean within > > the Git project", there is some small value in having another > > project member say "yes, that is exactly what I expect from it, > > too" > > Heh, thanks. > > Are you hinting that some of what I wrote (with typofixes like > s/arond/around/) should be inserted to SubmittingPatches or > somewhere near it? I would not be opposed to that, but I also do not want to create more work for you. :) -Peff