From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B411F61A for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 20:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.b="HIF8c4eD"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229543AbiLNUQe (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:16:34 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52486 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230130AbiLNUPY (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:15:24 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd2c.google.com (mail-io1-xd2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A7AC2F677 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:06:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2c.google.com with SMTP id z144so4034324iof.3 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:06:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TIrpWEPqqLfv+9W0lXzxOZ4fKkZW+0D/M9GaZSpcIXg=; b=HIF8c4eDEX7wnOFcsVjXW4Zii5NoPjhBTb3J4tt9/5T5EYZMy46zIELibQKtfUm4tE Ly/x1KgJPCKrRsIzKMV0n5UeXjGMeH0AajoTV2Qty2XvxbbkWt89GtEALyuCeEUL+PbX DqZt5vFhUbzKelrDdgFqrmHUWz6NMwIGNMRzzTSNLc377h62ItoopjD+6pt3DOqAIqCr PkKobJCC/sEmVeHQYTnBvc4vV+svYllEw0sXRarVGE9WeeMUWDbA4VfC2oguOqm6ThB1 QT5PyTMH8W2eGeydxQsiYMWNL1vYKctNT4AzBR2QlmFpXJfQKDKYDi0EPT0MWmyJgtGx 4Nlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=TIrpWEPqqLfv+9W0lXzxOZ4fKkZW+0D/M9GaZSpcIXg=; b=q22TQYuzFbuLJw0GHpFtETK9bad69HMozTu8w8aZBgJrI4NNooNrmEbEkDesGdn8Cf OzRr0dnQLlss1ddU8Rk7vKDXnPYoU0NwukkawbCF9pWQA1OrOkjhT/0+m+XDIyoaPY+c VppNhujE0l/Q8O6fDKelsnvPuFHNqX1sEuFg96OJcgMEyw8+av4REiQ7p3PKeX4PWU6z Q0ivdlWQOwyfstrPS7i9QBhcLbkJ+HKDuVSFIid5qYI16xRByj7c5TnfP8Ai3NjeJfle vqrlCBzxa0InQt0NUzcHGk+FFetZMCxfc9d40ASogtgvBmImYXASEFxkAyxs584xAwmm BtFg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnff1lmkJNkGtkqjgkf58nXE+Ieq62+xu/zQJ/4nfX7wQABylOr rJ/bvt4ZuyvpIu/mmH0vr0p5QkPZXbz7TZqq X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4v10RG/CiiuEpDrL5w/nCX1ZTvvtc85+VLn7Ue2mvRbiQ8DGBkSkLKD/ZpDVNzPALImQOAaw== X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8b43:0:b0:6df:5b14:61ee with SMTP id z3-20020a5e8b43000000b006df5b1461eemr12869957iom.5.1671048359813; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:05:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (104-178-186-189.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net. [104.178.186.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h21-20020a056602155500b006e302b99d00sm270623iow.20.2022.12.14.12.05.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Dec 2022 12:05:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:05:58 -0500 From: Taylor Blau To: Jeff King Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] minor ref-filter error-reporting bug-fixes Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 11:18:19AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > This series fixes a few small inconsistencies in the error-reporting > from ref-filter's atom parsers. Mostly I noticed this while dealing with > unused parameters in one of the parsers, which led to noticing a few > other small bugs. And I hope the result is a little cleaner, as it > should reduce the number of strings needing translation. > > [1/5]: ref-filter: reject arguments to %(HEAD) > [2/5]: ref-filter: factor out "%(foo) does not take arguments" errors > [3/5]: ref-filter: factor out "unrecognized %(foo) arg" errors > [4/5]: ref-filter: truncate atom names in error messages > [5/5]: ref-filter: convert email atom parser to use err_bad_arg() I gave this series a careful read and found it all very satisfying. The implementation is straightforward and leaves us with several much friendlier error messages in the ref-filter's atom parsing code. I left one comment throughout, but it was clarified when I read through the rest of the series. So this one looks ready to pick up to my eyes. Thanks, Taylor