From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"ZheNing Hu" <adlternative@gmail.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
johncai86@gmail.com, "Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: Question: How to execute git-gc correctly on the git server
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 20:37:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5KRQMcUlepwNlor@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221209004918.GI28810@kitsune.suse.cz>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022 at 01:49:18AM +0100, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > In this case it's the mtime on the object file (or the pack containing
> > it). But yes, it is far from a complete race-free solution.
>
> So if you are pushing a branch that happens to reuse commits or other
> objects from an earlier branh that might have been collected ín the
> meantime you are basically doomed.
Basically yes. We do "freshen" the mtimes on object files when we omit
an object write (e.g., your index state ends up at the same tree as an
old one). But for a push, there is no freshening. We check the graph at
the time of the push and decide if we have everything we need (either
newly pushed, or from what we already had in the repo). And that is
what's racy; somebody might be deleting as that check is happening.
> People deleting a branch and then pushing another variant in which many
> objects are the same is a risk.
>
> People exporting files from somewhere and adding them to the repo which
> are bit-identical when independently exported by multiple people and
> sometimes deleting branches is a risk.
Yes, both of those are risky (along with many other variants).
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-09 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-07 15:58 Question: How to execute git-gc correctly on the git server ZheNing Hu
2022-12-07 23:57 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-08 1:16 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-12-08 7:01 ` Jeff King
2022-12-09 0:49 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-12-09 1:37 ` Jeff King [this message]
2022-12-09 7:26 ` ZheNing Hu
2022-12-09 13:48 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-11 16:01 ` ZheNing Hu
2022-12-11 16:27 ` Michal Suchánek
2022-12-09 7:15 ` ZheNing Hu
2022-12-08 6:59 ` Jeff King
2022-12-08 12:35 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-14 20:11 ` Taylor Blau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5KRQMcUlepwNlor@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=adlternative@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johncai86@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).