From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: "Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-compat-util.h: introduce CALLOC(x)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:47:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y46fHhD3xionHgPE@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <221206.868rjle7za.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> But if we *are* doing that then surely we should provide the full set of
> functions. I.e. ALLOC() and ALLOC_ARRAY(), CALLOC() and CALLOC_ARRAY(),
> and REALLOC() and REALLOC_ARRAY()?
FWIW, I would be happy to see all of those (minus REALLOC(), as there is
not really any point in growing or shrinking something with a fixed
size).
The biggest argument against them that I can see is that:
struct foo *x = malloc(sizeof(*x));
is idiomatic C that newcomers to the project will easily understand,
and:
struct foo *x;
ALLOC(x);
is not. But it feels like we already crossed that bridge with
ALLOC_ARRAY(), etc.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-06 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 18:54 [PATCH] git-compat-util.h: introduce CALLOC(x) Taylor Blau
2022-12-05 21:01 ` René Scharfe
2022-12-05 22:36 ` Taylor Blau
2022-12-05 23:12 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-06 1:47 ` Jeff King [this message]
2022-12-06 1:58 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-07 6:02 ` Jeff King
2022-12-07 2:36 ` Taylor Blau
2022-12-07 2:34 ` Taylor Blau
2022-12-07 3:17 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-06 1:43 ` Jeff King
2022-12-07 2:29 ` Taylor Blau
2022-12-07 3:51 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-05 23:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-12-06 0:29 ` Taylor Blau
2022-12-06 1:21 ` Jeff King
2022-12-06 1:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-12-07 2:38 ` Taylor Blau
2022-12-07 6:08 ` Jeff King
2022-12-06 2:12 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-12-07 6:06 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y46fHhD3xionHgPE@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).