From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393FA1F910 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2022 01:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.b="POQWS1yT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230012AbiKCBbT (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2022 21:31:19 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40098 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229485AbiKCBbR (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2022 21:31:17 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7576313D02 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 18:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id d123so248721iof.7 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 18:31:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qERhpbtL5thBTtVu/ou3DlGIZ18YFEJ6dCe/Cta65JM=; b=POQWS1yT4mUR7TOzg3kPnwhC/MZKJtH+F9S/nu5ZIRPz4aKricS04xQzuvehVexlfQ 0edMAT7I7PF60yaat2trDaS3unWKsmecs7cMw9v5Jo/Sb1sogtgiBOGvje2d8S5VRX8d gX1kRspseWRhtGUGpuKHja/aCXV/KPygqgkW0xbnKJ2me2QD/BOcbHslx3pn7Ec7b7wT NBh/tWz/dmC5rS89kd5GAgkW2HfsbfMSkBoD7wz9T+RT209Z/VHBAe+UfjL2ctHPoGNs j3J1Da8ka5X1Ba3IwJi0t5twHlUoC9aB0vR4EmyUpCwLfnl71jQlCZECJMID/NxWHeO5 fiFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=qERhpbtL5thBTtVu/ou3DlGIZ18YFEJ6dCe/Cta65JM=; b=Zf3tfELlCVC7gw+7AjNcbQOGp3FoXEY0aYelAFvN0CtSBMl4Seq+SqP5p4BTJedcBJ bwV0G30y8xBlH7oH7Hfr11/lA6APo1rBqcQtaCVC2fFz2lkStd8YQO8p0RcfFG+v6MRW 90o9gKr/6vIlQxsDjXevqw4SP0JmDUHcHbh9tQpm5xHakqkaRxBthlJKPbsYBzUBjxHf oY8Xr9HXxSKlrKO4Tq7Pk5FBpRy7ZqTSHn62EThHs6bx+PzTXSmNvy7TaZev1RjCSRcE ZOldIxGAWrwpwJxuv+FoArFdehdtmMu7O2CzO/qrDzP7ueDvx+pPam15cdoFUVIXZ0GD aD+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2qUW6djyPYBAYxTGGXUPB5s5JOtkY9alsoBHSzLpaSpKbfzXgP R8yv+ICTbBNQYB0pkRiHosot5hqQ8z9E9Tkn X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM67OxgAEtZE+ObrX/4/OIDZLo/IZBoTWVfXsj0c1q6FXIsLOHJVuYOuVNcqMW80GUzO/p1xRw== X-Received: by 2002:a02:cc88:0:b0:375:3f45:33ae with SMTP id s8-20020a02cc88000000b003753f4533aemr16863118jap.171.1667439076826; Wed, 02 Nov 2022 18:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (104-178-186-189.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net. [104.178.186.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f19-20020a02a113000000b003754033c6aesm5260041jag.155.2022.11.02.18.31.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Nov 2022 18:31:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 21:31:15 -0400 From: Taylor Blau To: Jeff King Cc: Taylor Blau , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Derrick Stolee , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] t5551: be less strict about the number of credential warnings Message-ID: References: <221101.86a65b5q9q.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 05:18:29AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 04:42:13AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > As I said, I had tried to mostly leave patch 2 alone to avoid derailing > > Dscho's attempt to fix things. But somehow things got derailed anyway, > > so maybe we can just all agree on this patch and move on with our lives? > > By the way, I think you (or somebody?) mentioned elsewhere in the thread > that it's possible the first patch fixes things by itself. I would also > be content to just apply the first one and see if CI improves. > > Of course, when I just pushed all this out to CI, it flaked > independently on both osx (looks like racy p4 stuff) and fedora (network > dropout failed to set up the container). Sigh. Dreams are free, eh? Thanks, Taylor