From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5171F910 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 21:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.i=@ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.b="SxoEFn7W"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231625AbiKKV5E (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:57:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60212 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230103AbiKKV5C (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:57:02 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89B0A4877F for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:57:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id h206so4492917iof.10 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:57:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0iCM81TUMbf4MTRrAgzZQvLA35DjK3PmJFw8r+Uco+Y=; b=SxoEFn7WPIO3tW0bkINyVJdf4C4EYUC3E+IH3oBFp0ogIvTniD3WrvHmKXKlstOp+O M4qCufhK4tz/IwpyhtCSKm6pDPnnUYvS+b6SfuurgI/HRFYLMoP/6ZobA0xWy7N7vjID 9Zkq3elNToJAyScdhU2wyhM07za8f3C9DIK7DeDs3AI6V6KFpGJgZM7/SjQgW6fPU8hs wqpxu7ows9PL5erbGxA58ld9HwZ6PVu6l7aQmsleILsaubbcQHOpWo7+GORSyvRxz3LU 6CkuSAbiqVhZZ+HGhwP8bSQfJGiOB+NZ+h0mFSqJZERxQPhqrzCw1/uuqJKbvCAE58Eb 8ovg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=0iCM81TUMbf4MTRrAgzZQvLA35DjK3PmJFw8r+Uco+Y=; b=B84Ytv0mOwXszmH+MQiq4dAgSxrGIDXgCajp35upJcCIVL2xazbehoERUd6wCP91ir rMHTnvZFDPRaPibMo0rAdwdcsBkoInm3OWgtDe2THzlR0nI0cpHpfwOOZ/QD8ZKdbjSb AleCNu/dDJ2Dm7BTS5KyRxK8NIt6242BzkTYcRWLBemFY/95rpbPoixWe04KN1jtQPwl BGuis3jTCtJceH8PNCl1slFF+tKBlZAX4g0FkfqCGnkTnGc+7+4GxxWdPw1G7YyEqOYU V8oAZ/0pTlMPyD3p1yGbf7JTyxYWYZ4qTFNLh22f/IDNssEdhzjJ7mhKEL4869A1NMx9 FI9g== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmwhZFWLMGVOAZL38voYf12ph4VUMk7HYvraL6K9Psqxo5ezS8Y DI4fbY8Mta6Xh30XfPQobMmN8w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7H6nzK0rEiuAYWdiKxIKudg4Cpew7/EVDGcCKHsuQcjvSPZ5mszoePf3FEnweMadWA3RVRMA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2012:b0:6d2:76f4:e041 with SMTP id y18-20020a056602201200b006d276f4e041mr1915237iod.11.1668203820953; Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:57:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (104-178-186-189.lightspeed.milwwi.sbcglobal.net. [104.178.186.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c18-20020a023f52000000b00375687c7861sm1177371jaf.108.2022.11.11.13.57.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:57:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 16:56:59 -0500 From: Taylor Blau To: Eric Sunshine Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Eric Sunshine via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Taylor Blau , "brian m. carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] chainlint: sidestep impoverished macOS "terminfo" Message-ID: References: <221111.865yflo7p7.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 12:15:12PM -0500, Eric Sunshine wrote: > So, I think the fixed-up colorizing as implemented by v2 of this patch > series is good enough for now. It can always be revisited later if > something warrants it. Yeah, agree. Let's not let perfect be the enemy of the good ;-). Thanks, Taylor