From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F281F4B4 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 18:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733138AbgLISgO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:36:14 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:55800 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728625AbgLISgO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:36:14 -0500 Received: (qmail 19156 invoked by uid 109); 9 Dec 2020 18:35:30 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 18:35:30 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 17671 invoked by uid 111); 9 Dec 2020 18:35:29 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:35:29 -0500 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:35:29 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Julien Richard Cc: Julien Richard via GitGitGadget , "git@vger.kernel.org" , Julien Richard Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: 'T' status code for git status Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:01:36PM +0000, Julien Richard wrote: > > Perhaps "type changed (e.g., a symbolic link becoming a file)" would be more descriptive > > In fact I'm not sure how get the typechange, I always see the symbolic > link example but in my case I have a 100% repro on a repository but > ZI have no clue why its does so. > The file is just modified but appears as a type change :-S > > Could it be a bug? Possibly. If you have a reproduction recipe, share it and we can comment further. > About the changes you mentioned should I make the adjustements myself? Yes, usually you'd squash in any changes you want to make using "commit --amend" (or "rebase -i", but you only have one patch in the series), and then you can resubmit via GitGitGadget. -Peff