From: Jeff King <email@example.com> To: Taylor Blau <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Thomas Braun <email@example.com>, Derrick Stolee <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] handling 4GB .idx files Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 08:12:53 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <X8eS1Zrqk99AjKkD@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <X8aLDlzcNCwP699c@nand.local> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:27:26PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote: > I have a sense that probably very few people actually run GIT_TEST_LONG > regularly, and that that group may vanish entirely if we added a test > which increased the runtime of the suite by 20x in this mode. Yeah, and if that's so, then I'm OK with calling it EXPENSIVE and moving on with our lives. And I guess merging this is one way to find out, if anybody screams. The stakes are low enough that I don't mind doing that. > I have mixed feelings about VERY_EXPENSIVE. On one hand, having this > test checked in so that we can quickly refer back to it in the case of a > regression is useful. On the other hand, what is it worth to have this > in-tree if nobody ever runs it? I'm speculating about whether or not > people would run this, of course. > > My hunch is that anybody who is interested enough to fix regressions in > this area would be able to refer back to the list archive to dig up this > thread and recover the script. > > I don't feel strongly, really, but just noting some light objections to > checking this test into the suite. Yeah, that about matches my feelings. But if Thomas wants to wrap it up as a patch, I don't mind seeing what happens (and I think with the suggestions I gave earlier, it would be in good shape). -Peff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 13:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-13 5:06 Jeff King 2020-11-13 5:06 ` [PATCH 1/5] compute pack .idx byte offsets using size_t Jeff King 2020-11-13 5:07 ` [PATCH 2/5] use size_t to store pack .idx byte offsets Jeff King 2020-11-13 5:07 ` [PATCH 3/5] fsck: correctly compute checksums on idx files larger than 4GB Jeff King 2020-11-13 5:07 ` [PATCH 4/5] block-sha1: take a size_t length parameter Jeff King 2020-11-13 5:07 ` [PATCH 5/5] packfile: detect overflow in .idx file size checks Jeff King 2020-11-13 11:02 ` Johannes Schindelin 2020-11-15 14:43 ` [PATCH 0/5] handling 4GB .idx files Thomas Braun 2020-11-16 4:10 ` Jeff King 2020-11-16 13:30 ` Derrick Stolee 2020-11-16 23:49 ` Jeff King 2020-11-30 22:57 ` Thomas Braun 2020-12-01 11:23 ` Jeff King 2020-12-01 11:39 ` t7900's new expensive test Jeff King 2020-12-01 20:55 ` Derrick Stolee 2020-12-02 2:47 ` [PATCH] t7900: speed up " Jeff King 2020-12-03 15:23 ` Derrick Stolee 2020-12-01 18:27 ` [PATCH 0/5] handling 4GB .idx files Taylor Blau 2020-12-02 13:12 ` Jeff King [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=X8eS1Zrqk99AjKkD@coredump.intra.peff.net \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/5] handling 4GB .idx files' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).