From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525EC1F86C for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728283AbgKZAm7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:42:59 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:43188 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726719AbgKZAm7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:42:59 -0500 Received: (qmail 12326 invoked by uid 109); 26 Nov 2020 00:42:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:42:59 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 12245 invoked by uid 111); 26 Nov 2020 00:42:58 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:42:58 -0500 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 19:42:58 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org, szeder.dev@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] update-ref: allow creation of multiple transactions Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 02:37:54PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt writes: > > > this is the fourth version of this patch series implementing support for > > creation of multiple reference transactions in a single git-update-ref > > process. > > It is my impression that the series is now in good enough shape that > we didn't see much discussion on this round. > > So I'll mark this to be merged to 'next', but I ask reviewers to > please holler to stop me otherwise. Yeah, this looks good to me for advancing. Thanks. -Peff