From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9834C1F4B4 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 19:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390828AbhAKTTM (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:19:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43608 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732725AbhAKTTM (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:19:12 -0500 Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8D73C061786 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:18:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id e7so272930ili.2 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:18:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8xnOye8oSzqFMBrjfukfqBhP2tTqGx4ZUbLJwpdzKVs=; b=AYGf8RJAVy99aAE9n8WnvvyOgLbpZRm9xXHadkrnKjAzxDTViZgUd9NDYfZ7FPlvUf 1ep7HWqQcRPhBRRVHG78u43DKRJHbyQyBRH0GkAen4ld0js7JrcmcGCr5WQqK+RgiqlB htHUEjBNaiy5MBOUHD/uSNGD2Vrlzi9TM1dHFDZNuGwg9RmWTYlsZBiv3b7YJ0GTeWyH 8mQ4jTtDH+HqEW3yNqm2nUbKD1CdlOkT3IKgft3ND7YlsKVK+he0duMP7jMRJJ+Iwwuc +msvywUGxBSnhC80oDnzYVh3Shmj7BQoPPzNH+gxUGnrLFvSpJrem/x4OthYKQeZfb4z /yKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=8xnOye8oSzqFMBrjfukfqBhP2tTqGx4ZUbLJwpdzKVs=; b=DGKaJgCVhm2Qo5vCwoPIyiBkLjqxuVJIapJtkXYke5XTVDcdvbG+U7POGYqKhE8Sg5 wi/Z96aSKcj+m2Mw1NlpLAUP5dhfta5tHSZgbQ1q+lK/PP+RPbbma2cwT1RBP0FXJR2N JHapzbUieUh9fz4kooQO+pPaPOk++AvRGu5m7ZNX5yvqsVWId0+3qaZVmEiTXEQhfRn8 MQPLHZQglZ17NKw5EG5fX9dbOmtRgEchgpkf5HqbwdeIDZR0+LddexsFvY4YXOc7VV52 kWOyoRQtKrQyv6X0Pu5FazblwZuZYMGjueEl7g/F5A/8ngCoOibOLCQdVZI2s7LQ1RK5 3RUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wMgjoZnckm39Rh34Q0Y0fjcRrEfYJLCiusIFxcTd5U1WlD190 zol3wXiAXR2L2JngLy7ae9CY7A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXmXy4MjPBKYr/GZQ5puDTDTFLsx5Sp4AKlga2cXBhnDVTRpWmRflMuu29uAZts+YRteDRVg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1a8e:: with SMTP id k14mr598516ilv.308.1610392711066; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:18:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2605:9480:22e:ff10:42e2:d139:3745:d47]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm282114ilg.51.2021.01.11.11.18.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:18:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:18:27 -0500 From: Taylor Blau To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Taylor Blau , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Nika Layzell via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Nika Layzell Subject: Re: Cc'ing the Git maintainer on GitGitGadget contributions, was Re: [PATCH 0/1] add--interactive: skip index refresh in reset patch mode Message-ID: References: <87wnwordzh.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 12:18:33PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > Hi Taylor, > > > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Taylor Blau wrote: > > ... > >> I think that this could be reasonably addressed. When someone opens a PR > >> (but before the hit /submit), GGG could say: > >> > >> Your change touches these files, and so suggested reviewers include > >> X, Y, Z. When you believe your submission is in its last round, > >> please also include the maintainer, M. > > > > That is an option. > > As Taylor created the above suggestion as a counter-proposal, I can > see that I apparently did not express what I meant very well, when I > said: ...or that I must have not read your email which quite clearly states what I was thinking of, too. ;-). > So perhaps we three are on the same page from the beginning ;-) I think so. Thanks, Taylor