From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153DD1F4B4 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 21:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727014AbhAJV1s (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:27:48 -0500 Received: from injection.crustytoothpaste.net ([192.241.140.119]:50382 "EHLO injection.crustytoothpaste.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726394AbhAJV1s (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:27:48 -0500 Received: from camp.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b978:101:b610:a2f0:36c1:12e3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by injection.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF75C60781; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 21:26:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1610313997; bh=MPLMT9N7ktARjvR7sy6Y6pEm60/JRnzv/Dex1WNnqtE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=ZNyEzK3MOFhHpdbxvuYs5j2cZyjfWt62/YqI1qHAP/czsim4VARD9n/uqb2ItRtDY Ss5ulx5BoeCUkr3wXwO9JrxVC1Kk4YpJcwKLTHK7pUv0sxTd/+4YonRYSQdcaFcun6 WEYgQJMtvlUFeMC1VMtmzGB2DiczynglIsrGDigaa0z/vXeNJCvNSxFA3uhuVNAE/d prjLGwdKSZNg6dn5kFBNU2SgxxvRPZzB4xglITestabZ9rRmxXhEnKNLQHa72yUIYC +NERX7/CfgL9+CkXAEx+qJy+N0vdWgUW8ORgIiC23v396jUZbdGpio37tEGnnS3OXK 0q/bk3gfNRf35Hb9Dz99I+Z5bjc5hHntYD14orBWDABAobJok29Xzq8MMSFJzMr4Ky Sy4KWIGMCEmcWgIUMc7WMzFvY7oYWLK0JsfenGRlwf1uxuO0RjrY0gofkrjtc1DEOx 7cqbj6MaCCGWSQywgy0cf/eQBEhnyb+5CuGgS8v/wBwiWh5VJUH Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 21:26:31 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] mailmap: support hashed entries in mailmaps Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Phillip Wood References: <20210103211849.2691287-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <20210103211849.2691287-6-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> <875z4bsbuz.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <87sg7861e5.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lNeFylX1ikylw0Ju" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sg7861e5.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/2.0.2 (2020-11-20) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org --lNeFylX1ikylw0Ju Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2021-01-10 at 19:24:34, =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason wrote: > Doesn't the difference in some sense boil down to either an implicit > promise or an implicit assumption that the hashed version is forever > going to be protected by some security-through-obscurity/inconvenience > when it comes to git.git & its default tooling? >=20 > And would those users be as comfortable with the difference between > encoded v.s. hashed if e.g. "git check-mailmap" learned to read the > .mailmap and search-replace all the hashed versions with their > materialized values, or if popular tools like Emacs learned to via a Git > .mailmap in a "need translation" similar to *.gpg and *.gz. How about if > popular web views of Git served up that materialized "check-mailmap" > output by default? >=20 > None of which I think is implausible that we'll get as follow-up > patches, I might even submit some at some point, not out of some spite. > Just because I don't want to maintain out-of-tree code for an > out-of-tree program that understands a Git .mailmap today, but where I'd > need to search-replace the hashed versions. Yes, I think we do rely on this being inconvenient. If you plan to submit such a patch, I'm going to let this series drop. --=20 brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them) Houston, Texas, US --lNeFylX1ikylw0Ju Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.2.20 (GNU/Linux) iHUEABYKAB0WIQQILOaKnbxl+4PRw5F8DEliiIeigQUCX/txBwAKCRB8DEliiIei gf10AQDjTS3Cx877CyxuxPiuIjvrGJdPmgis0VLKHJrsblnuXQD/SE4DYTiVsTrm enyDmsGNVoqsH4o3G3M6geQels4/Pg8= =ZRrV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lNeFylX1ikylw0Ju--