From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A2F1F4B4 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:35:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725902AbhAMHcx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 02:32:53 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:54470 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725747AbhAMHcw (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 02:32:52 -0500 Received: (qmail 21146 invoked by uid 109); 13 Jan 2021 07:32:11 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:32:11 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 26798 invoked by uid 111); 13 Jan 2021 07:32:13 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 02:32:13 -0500 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 02:32:11 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= , SZEDER =?utf-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [RFH] Introduce support for GETTEXT_POISON=rot13 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:50:52AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > Likewise, I'm not sure that one can reliably rot13 an output for > > test_i18ncmp. It could contain mixed translated and untranslated bits > > from different messages. > > As long as ... marking can be trusted (and it cannot > be, but if we declare it is OK to punt, then by definition we can), > I think the messages can be compared. Good point. I should have looked at the implementation more carefully before responding (and I agree that while not foolproof, tagging like that would work OK in practice). -Peff