From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392F11F4B4 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 19:55:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2392862AbhALTyW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:54:22 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2392852AbhALTyW (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:54:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E6FDC061575 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:53:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id g24so2421368qtq.12 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:53:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ttaylorr-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=cS1Wk2kwHEE/m43Jke5pJZMp+QAsQGGN6gEYOEE32sQ=; b=G1jvrrvCJZ+lk+d0FVu4BnN+t5QXDX7e+K84jCUDBWPFsJgTTgjXZdS8A0ahtzmBtz ai6LTfs5+AnOrBSbRhLyZ7z1X4lNKJrpm3SOsWebntr6SFW68f8GdoaVoidaq0ecN+JA eh1MI5VdLk8wDr7fvPac6ZAFIqeClu2rsG6R7RPN4dNDbE+MXNeBAL1/8e7Av165Uyue 7+yBi7cehRnyTLCss0xEVAlnHkQXf2pArFrhfuXfuCPaogxmqjR3M+8s2gR8+WS0fk4Z bKhMXy4pKgX/jw2eNqA6TWVVyMCKqPQmqJhd9tADanKiz3kY6nGmv5USNhvmkPIFUVWn LbWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=cS1Wk2kwHEE/m43Jke5pJZMp+QAsQGGN6gEYOEE32sQ=; b=tj2wijR3ZM56bpTWu+feBAXE8wG2m7QtIMNBQHSiK1VgTmwkKzBmDXhMaNzdPcbcNU veI8XNXfXoM99c+P7KQGBQ94CK/nhhCyXhsw1bTTvpWwDAS83LxhAH7wyz2xFi8vqXXH pTBp36FsZtMdLRni4H1/mC8TfeIj0zl4jxQIb0TWb/Q6+PRE/Thoi7lWodwrs8YYRqq1 yStqJQTtOv8lJbWawJDMvIOJX1wCwMn45TV+r+WlADBGcgxP+zwh1uK+2dF7fkgkVvWU pKyfXi7DwIR0SlwvfZ9ssiP0uyNGRlnN8kVlEfqlZ2mIgmlPmfUGqX7hVfHpGnrm7wdO YHtg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jdVbrKlssA88bbU9oT2LzTf6fvtZPx/5n536GXAeNjUaq5vWR RUYfYIG9ZXTnmoWXDlzOyig2zrUtVEjF/g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzNCuKaTSlAouuPOZ+szpRJkQElXzXR6YeJQZYX5399RZK5Y/OGZtOh2UCZQ75Zjg6Di3EAaw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7b2c:: with SMTP id l12mr679341qtu.105.1610481215254; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:53:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2605:9480:22e:ff10:f17c:3911:cace:ed91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 60sm1687090qth.14.2021.01.12.11.53.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 11:53:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:53:32 -0500 From: Taylor Blau To: =?utf-8?B?xJBvw6BuIFRy4bqnbiBDw7RuZw==?= Danh Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: test-tool: bloom: generate_filter for multiple string? Message-ID: References: <20201231035438.22533-1-congdanhqx@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20201231035438.22533-1-congdanhqx@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 10:54:38AM +0700, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm reading the code for Bloom Filter to see if arXiv:2012.00472 > could be an improvement. I'm late to the party, but I'm curious to hear which part of this article you think would help out the Bloom filter implementation. (I skimmed the article you're referencing during my time off, but haven't come back to read it in detail since, so it's possible that the part I'm missing is just totally obvious.) > I'm not sure if I'm missing something or it's our test-bloom generate_filter > doesn't really support testing for multiple inputs. The rest of this discussion downthread seems sane to me. Thanks, Taylor