From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA751F4B4 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405638AbhALI6l (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:58:41 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net ([104.130.231.41]:53088 "EHLO cloud.peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727916AbhALI6l (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:58:41 -0500 Received: (qmail 6339 invoked by uid 109); 12 Jan 2021 08:58:00 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 08:58:00 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 10955 invoked by uid 111); 12 Jan 2021 08:58:02 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:58:02 -0500 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 03:57:59 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, jrnieder@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/20] show_objects_for_type(): convert to new revindex API Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 01:17:09PM -0500, Taylor Blau wrote: > diff --git a/pack-bitmap.c b/pack-bitmap.c > index d6861ddd4d..80c57bde73 100644 > --- a/pack-bitmap.c > +++ b/pack-bitmap.c > @@ -711,21 +711,22 @@ static void show_objects_for_type( > > for (offset = 0; offset < BITS_IN_EWORD; ++offset) { > struct object_id oid; > - struct revindex_entry *entry; > - uint32_t hash = 0; > + uint32_t hash = 0, n; > + off_t ofs; A minor nit, but "n" isn't very descriptive. It's not in scope for very long, so that's not too bad, but there are two positions at work in this function: the pos/offset bit position, and the index position. Maybe "index_pos" would be better than "n" to keep the two clear? -Peff