From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixing path quoting issues Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:37:37 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <11920508172434-git-send-email-jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv> <470DC05A.8020209@viscovery.net> <854pgytafi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <470DCC76.7070809@viscovery.net> <81156EED-7AC0-4C8B-98B1-8338262459A6@bestbefore.tv> <470DD3B8.1080809@viscovery.net> <85k5pts796.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Johannes Sixt , Jonathan del Strother , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Wincent Colaiuta X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 12 13:38:23 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IgIqI-0008EB-Kt for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:38:11 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753767AbXJLLiA (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:38:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753711AbXJLLiA (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:38:00 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:38065 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753702AbXJLLh7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:37:59 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Oct 2007 11:37:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 12 Oct 2007 13:37:58 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18cHkcc7cUcYmhnb/rsIjdhSMBN3Ug/oO2X/SeLrm S6JjRgjbFQYejo X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > El 11/10/2007, a las 22:53, David Kastrup escribi?: > > > Johannes Sixt writes: > > > > > Jonathan del Strother schrieb: > > > > How are you going to test that git works on paths with spaces if the > > > > test suite doesn't run there? > > > > > > By writing a specific test? > > > > This is going to be much less thorough. And it does no harm if the > > test scripts demonstrate defensive programming. > > +1: especially in this case, where it really is "defensive" and not > "paranoiac". I am all for it, _iff_ the guilty parties (and by that, I mean _you_) do it and keep maintaining it. See? Discussion closed already. Ciao, Dscho