From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: C++ *for Git* Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:48:47 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Git To: Dmitry Kakurin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 22 14:50:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IZ4Qy-0000ns-2h for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:50:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752126AbXIVMtq (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:49:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752680AbXIVMtq (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:49:46 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:38697 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752681AbXIVMtp (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:49:45 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2007 12:49:44 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO openvpn-client) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 22 Sep 2007 14:49:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19gz5U3Z2xgT7Z3i9V15rHUrrvThvS2P4klQJwsfh j4/ub94Be/cGDo X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Dmitry Kakurin wrote: > We've had this theoretical (and IMHO pointless) discussion C vs. C++ *in > general*. I think "pointless" is more to the point. We don't want C++. Why is that so hard to accept? Ciao, Dscho