From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add git-rev-list --invert-match Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:54:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070919202615.GK3076@jukie.net> <20070920123849.GD12076@jukie.net> <7vtzppj9d1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Bart Trojanowski , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 20 23:55:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IYTzv-0007re-IJ for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:55:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751303AbXITVzn (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:55:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751410AbXITVzm (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:55:42 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:48623 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750994AbXITVzm (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:55:42 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2007 21:55:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 20 Sep 2007 23:55:41 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/CIxJmoJHCH+CSUXDgi4isgpWlGZfqGEvq249TwN wubvxrXkh4ctoL X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <7vtzppj9d1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > Further, it probably makes sense to have the option to say _both_: > > "Find me a commit that contains Bart in one line, but not Simpson, and > > that does not contain the word "Sverdoolaege" at all." > > Yeah. And I think we would also want to have that at the > underlying "grep" layer wouldn't we? That's what I tried to get at... Already on IRC, I tried to direct the attention to that thread on the list... There I had an ugly patch, which was incomplete, mainly because I did not sort out the semantics first. But the idea was to put this into grep.c so that both git-log and git-grep could benefit from that feature. Ciao, Dscho