From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] contrib/fast-import: add perl version of simple example Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:36:12 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070918072627.GB3506@coredump.intra.peff.net> <46EFA84C.3080906@op5.se> <20070918103051.GA22239@coredump.intra.peff.net> <46EFBD40.1070102@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jeff King , Andreas Ericsson , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" To: Sam Vilain X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 18 14:37:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IXcKD-0007e2-7E for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:37:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755026AbXIRMhE (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:37:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754509AbXIRMhE (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:37:04 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49191 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751613AbXIRMhB (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 08:37:01 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2007 12:36:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp058) with SMTP; 18 Sep 2007 14:36:59 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+BGu1EhgWBRnGzKRmQycviAGNFbA7viFlz/dTCtZ v98KATL9TFMbdX X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <46EFBD40.1070102@vilain.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Sam Vilain wrote: > I personally want to be able to dump patches, including merges, to > git-format-patch format, in such a way that all other information (eg, > committer, date, etc) is preserved. We already talked about that on IRC, and you have not even _begun_ to think about the fundamental issues with merges-in-a-patch. I mentioned a few on IRC, and am still awaiting your reply. Unless you tackle those fundamental issues, I am afraid it is not worth bothering to discuss this subject any more. Ciao, Dscho