From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: metastore (was: Track /etc directory using Git) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:48:54 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070915132632.GA31610@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <20070915145437.GA12875@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Daniel Barkalow , martin f krafft , git@vger.kernel.org, "Thomas Harning Jr." , Francis Moreau , Nicolas Vilz , David =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdeman?= To: david@lang.hm X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Sep 16 04:49:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IWkCj-0003yu-Hh for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 04:49:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752750AbXIPCtm (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:49:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752722AbXIPCtm (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:49:42 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41473 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752668AbXIPCtm (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:49:42 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2007 02:49:40 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO openvpn-client) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 16 Sep 2007 04:49:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/svfUyc8/sobjCVkwpUJm9ZZBFGn2jIrsIHmvCHX g6Xp36PbdRYjuP X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, david@lang.hm wrote: > so would changes like this be acceptable? Would they be acceptable for you? If so, go ahead. If not, don't. Hth, Dscho