From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: metastore (was: Track /etc directory using Git) Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:43:54 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070915132632.GA31610@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <20070915145437.GA12875@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: martin f krafft , git@vger.kernel.org, "Thomas Harning Jr." , Francis Moreau , Nicolas Vilz , David =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdeman?= To: Grzegorz Kulewski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 15 19:44:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IWbhH-0003XT-5n for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:44:47 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753137AbXIORom (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:44:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753135AbXIORom (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:44:42 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:36039 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753116AbXIORol (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:44:41 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2007 17:44:39 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO openvpn-client) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp057) with SMTP; 15 Sep 2007 19:44:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX196IPMt0rJ6ZJ9OyW4B4lzif+D6Iy1QdgwBh4FU75 L5f25mJTNpeSlW X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote: > On Sat, 15 Sep 2007, martin f krafft wrote: > > I understand also that this is not top priority for git, which is why > > I said earlier in the thread that the real difficulty might be to get > > Junio to accept a patch. But I think that the patch would be rather > > contained and small, having it all configurable would make it > > unintrusive, and if we all test it real well, it should pass as a > > bonus. After all, git can e.g upload patches to IMAP boxes, which in > > my world clearly is bonus material as well. > > I also think such configuration option would be cool. Why don't you just give it a try? Hack on git, make it work for what you want to do, clean it up, make a nice patch series, post it here. Then we'll talk. Ciao, Dscho