From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [RFC] Convert builin-mailinfo.c to use The Better String Library. Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:56:42 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <46DDC500.5000606@etek.chalmers.se> <1189004090.20311.12.camel@hinata.boston.redhat.com> <4AFD7EAD1AAC4E54A416BA3F6E6A9E52@ntdev.corp.microsoft.com> <46E0EEC6.4020004@op5.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Wincent Colaiuta , Dmitry Kakurin , Linus Torvalds , Matthieu Moy , Git To: Andreas Ericsson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 07 12:57:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITbWp-0007Zg-JT for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:57:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965125AbXIGK5B (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:57:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965122AbXIGK5B (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:57:01 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:51474 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965120AbXIGK5A (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Sep 2007 06:57:00 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Sep 2007 10:56:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [138.251.11.74]) [138.251.11.74] by mail.gmx.net (mp050) with SMTP; 07 Sep 2007 12:56:58 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/th2VmIZzt0759AU7FU2l++m9DBnPlZ1YOJy6gyz VkyKfHoIxpAOmF X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <46E0EEC6.4020004@op5.se> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > > El 7/9/2007, a las 2:21, Dmitry Kakurin escribi?: > > > > > I just wanted to get a sense of how many people share this "Git should > > > be in pure C" doctrine. > > > > Count me as one of them. Git is all about speed, and C is the best choice > > for speed, especially in context of Git's workload. > > > > Nono, hand-optimized assembly is the best choice for speed. C is just > a little more portable ;-) I have a buck here that says that you cannot hand-optimise assembly (on modern processors at least) as good as even gcc. Ciao, Dscho