From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>,
"Andreas Ericsson" <ae@op5.se>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Michael Gernoth" <simigern@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
"Thomas Glanzmann" <thomas@glanzmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/3] archive: rename attribute specfile to export-subst
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 11:45:10 +0100 (BST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709071144450.28586@racer.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd4wva4lv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
Hi,
On Thu, 6 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
> > The bigger question is now if these two patches should be folded back
> > into your original patch series, or stand alone as commits of their
> > own...
>
> That is no brainer, as there is a simple and hard rule that any topic
> already in 'next' are not to be rewound ever. Follow-up patches are the
> right thing to do in this case.
Right. At the time I suggested it, I was not aware that the patches were
in next already.
Sorry,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-07 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-03 18:07 [PATCH 2/3] archive: specfile support (--pretty=format: in archive files) René Scharfe
2007-09-03 18:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-03 20:19 ` David Kastrup
2007-09-04 23:13 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-03 23:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-04 5:45 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-09-04 10:41 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-04 23:13 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-05 0:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-05 0:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-06 16:20 ` [PATCH 4/3] archive: specfile syntax change: "$Format:%PLCHLDR$" instead of just "%PLCHLDR" René Scharfe
2007-09-06 17:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-06 20:35 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-06 20:53 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-06 23:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-07 10:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-06 22:32 ` [PATCH 3.5/3] add memmem() René Scharfe
2007-09-06 22:34 ` [PATCH 4/3] archive: specfile syntax change: "$Format:%PLCHLDR$" instead of just "%PLCHLDR" (take 2) René Scharfe
2007-09-06 16:51 ` [PATCH 5/3] archive: rename attribute specfile to export-subst René Scharfe
2007-09-06 17:13 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-06 20:38 ` René Scharfe
2007-09-06 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-07 10:45 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2007-09-04 23:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] archive: specfile support (--pretty=format: in archive files) René Scharfe
2007-09-05 0:19 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0709071144450.28586@racer.site \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=ae@op5.se \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
--cc=simigern@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=thomas@glanzmann.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).