From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: name-rev does not show the shortest path Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:57:22 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <20070823103817.GF6573@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> <20070824125230.GA12030@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> <7v6434eq9o.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20070826092323.GB30474@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20070827092422.GA20340@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Junio C Hamano , Julian Phillips , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 11:55:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPbJd-0004zw-8M for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:55:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753388AbXH0JzR (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:55:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753349AbXH0JzR (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:55:17 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:42448 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753378AbXH0JzO (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:55:14 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2007 09:55:12 -0000 Received: from ppp-82-135-74-69.dynamic.mnet-online.de (EHLO [192.168.1.4]) [82.135.74.69] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 27 Aug 2007 11:55:12 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+QyHwUX+2QSAgLUz9n93kgqct23tgRd15yPWOunZ h/RuH3QtQsUrVk X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: <20070827092422.GA20340@coredump.intra.peff.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 05:38:22PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > The old code _should_ have worked; it is more likely that your > > different metric just hides the bug. The old metric tried to favour > > less merge traversals over more traversals, but at the same time, it > > favoured smaller numbers over larger ones (but as you found out, only > > in the last component). > > Right, the problem is that we have effectively _thrown away_ the > "smaller numbers over larger ones" information for components other than > the last. You're right. I misremembered name-rev to use a fifo instead of stupid recursion. Will fix. Ciao, Dscho