From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2007 partial summary Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:26:42 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: References: <200708190128.43515.jnareb@gmail.com> <200708270251.05762.jnareb@gmail.com> <61e816970708262024m1cbbfd4dxfeb10b56397670b8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git discussion list To: Benoit SIGOURE X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 11:24:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPaps-0004GI-EE for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:24:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752711AbXH0JYh (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:24:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752701AbXH0JYg (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:24:36 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46109 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752661AbXH0JYg (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 05:24:36 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Aug 2007 09:24:31 -0000 Received: from ppp-82-135-74-69.dynamic.mnet-online.de (EHLO [192.168.1.4]) [82.135.74.69] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 27 Aug 2007 11:24:31 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19WaN9iuttWQF4x7F/Orw5SkCFi0NmtBEClRHMfFJ 0308WdchTZRLu1 X-X-Sender: gene099@racer.site In-Reply-To: X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Benoit SIGOURE wrote: > On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Dan Chokola wrote: > > > > > On 8/26/07, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > > > 55. Would commerical (paid) support from a support vendor be of > > > > interest to you/your organization? > > > > > > > > Only 44 answers yes, 217 no, 126 not applicable (which was menat to > > > > encompass people who do not use git for work). > > > > > > Are questions like this at all indicative of where Git is looking > > > towards going? > > > > No. These questions are just questions. Git is GPLv2, and it will > > probably stay that forever, so you are _free_ to start a commercial > > support scheme for Git, but others are free not to choose it. > > > > I for one could imagine training people, and giving technical support for > > companies needing that support. > > You seem to imply that GPLv3 would prevent any form of commercial > support for Git... No, I was not. I was only being overly precise in my description. My apologies ;-) Ciao, Dscho