From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Implementing branch attributes in git config Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 20:08:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1147037659.25090.25.camel@dv> <1147048587.17371.13.camel@dv> <7vfyjli9vf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vbqu9i6zl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7virogc90u.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v1wv4c7wk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: junkio@cox.net, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 09 05:08:53 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdIai-0004UV-TW for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 09 May 2006 05:08:53 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751344AbWEIDIt (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 23:08:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751350AbWEIDIt (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 23:08:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:7073 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751344AbWEIDIt (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 May 2006 23:08:49 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4938gtH013073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 8 May 2006 20:08:42 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k4938f1b029600; Mon, 8 May 2006 20:08:41 -0700 To: sean In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.74__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.134 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, 8 May 2006, sean wrote: > > What's the advantage of section quotation marks over just allowing these > characters in regular section names? To be specific, what is wrong with: > > [jc/show-branch-dense] This would _suck_ What if you have a branch called "core"? Not all all unlikely. Think about what a section like [core] really means. Plus I really want to not be case sensitive by default. Case sensitivity really is _not_ normal for this kind of config file syntax. Linus