From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Commit order in git.git, was Re: [RFC] Two conceptually distinct commit commands
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 10:54:24 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0612061052490.28348@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874ps91v79.wl%cworth@cworth.org>
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:13:20 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > (This is offtopic)
>
> It's an interesting topic nonetheless, so I'll comment anyway.
>
> > (1) one commit exposes, then another fixes.
> > (2) one commit fixes, then another verifies the bug is no more.
> > (3) one commit to include both.
>
> I feel very strongly that I want (1) in the history.
Note that (1) maybe would reflect history better, but (2) and (3) are way
nicer to bisecting.
I fell very strongly that I want (3) in the history.
(Though I am guilty of many instances of (2)...)
Ciao,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-06 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-04 19:08 [RFC] Two conceptually distinct commit commands Carl Worth
2006-12-04 20:10 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-04 21:19 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-05 2:36 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-05 0:52 ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-12-05 1:18 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-05 2:14 ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-12-05 2:32 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-05 1:19 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-05 3:51 ` Theodore Tso
2006-12-05 6:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-05 6:38 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-06 1:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-06 4:53 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-06 9:54 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2006-12-06 16:14 ` Carl Worth
2006-12-06 18:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-06 23:29 ` Carl Worth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0612061052490.28348@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=cworth@cworth.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).