From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-explain Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 01:27:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <200612031701.15594.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> <7v1wngwws6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vwt57j94c.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46a038f90612051500w44438f70y3c7d1c99998d16bb@mail.gmail.com> <7vslfudjsa.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vu009dhgz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 00:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-X-Sender: gene099@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de In-Reply-To: <7vu009dhgz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1GrkdX-0005ZN-AB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:27:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758765AbWLFA1o (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:27:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758818AbWLFA1o (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:27:44 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:54260 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758765AbWLFA1n (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:27:43 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Dec 2006 00:27:42 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO dumbo2) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 06 Dec 2006 01:27:42 +0100 To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > But the more I think about it, I feel that "undo" is less important. Me, too. I was really astonished that people said -- after quite some explanations -- "wow, you mean I did not lose any work?" That's the nice thing about git: it is really hard to lose any objects. Unless you explicitely issue a "git prune", you can resurrect whatever was your state. In this spirit, maybe it is time to enable reflog per default? Ciao, Dscho