From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: What's in git.git Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:21:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <7vzmaf3kdl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <87zmabv0i7.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-X-Sender: gene099@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de In-Reply-To: <87zmabv0i7.wl%cworth@cworth.org> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GpMZD-0005Ii-Mc for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:21:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966872AbWK2KVZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:21:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966874AbWK2KVY (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:21:24 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:63454 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S966872AbWK2KVY (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:21:24 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2006 10:21:22 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO dumbo2) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp045) with SMTP; 29 Nov 2006 11:21:22 +0100 To: Carl Worth Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Tue, 28 Nov 2006, Carl Worth wrote: > On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 02:12:38 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > * The new "--depth $n" parameter to git clone/fetch tries to > > limit the commit ancestry depth to $n. > [...] > Has though been given to make the depth selection consistent with > other limiting options for rev-parse and rev-list? For example, I'd > like to be able to use --since to get a shallow clone, (so should > --depth instead be --max-count?, and can we re-use some existing > machinery here?). I briefly considered that, but decided against it, for two reasons: 1) it puts the burden of calculation on the server, and 2) I was not at all sure if the whole shallow stuff would be useful to begin with (and therefore avoided complicated stuff as much as possible). > > Petr Baudis (1): > > Make git-clone --use-separate-remote the default > ... > > Junio C Hamano (19): > > git-merge: make it usable as the first class UI > > Also very exciting. Please do keep up the user-interface improvements, > everybody. I concur. Ciao, Dscho