From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: What's in git.git Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:17:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <7v64dcbdgb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v1wo0bb4z.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2006 15:17:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org X-Authenticated: #1490710 X-X-Sender: gene099@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de In-Reply-To: <7v1wo0bb4z.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GloQE-0004jW-Gd for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2006 16:17:30 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756713AbWKSPRV (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:17:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756714AbWKSPRV (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:17:21 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:27085 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756713AbWKSPRU (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:17:20 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2006 15:17:18 -0000 Received: from wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de (EHLO dumbo2) [132.187.25.13] by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 19 Nov 2006 16:17:18 +0100 To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > - 'pu' has the shallow clone WIP and a half-finished rewrite of > > git branch in C, both by Johannes. Both needs a bit more > > polishing and confidence building before going into 'next', > > and given the recent discussion of enhancing branch > > management for pulls/pushes, it might be easier to drop the > > latter for now. > > OOPS; sorry but the latter half is entirely untrue. What's > there is half-done git-shortlog. Scratch everything about > branch management please. IMHO -shortlog needs support to read .mailmap, and maybe nods to throw out the built-in mailmap which is totally specific to the Linux kernel development. As for shallow clone support: I am a bit underwhelmed by the enthusiasm to test this thing by the people I thought would be most interested. It really could be the case that it is not needed at all. Just for the record, though: AFAICT the shallow stuff is lacking support for at least pushing from/into shallow repos and it should avoid making a commit shallow unnecessarily. And quite likely there are a few thinkos in it, so it would not hurt having more test cases (notably of things I did not think of), and some bad-ass testing with huge amounts of commits and files which were added/modified identically in different commits. Ciao, Dscho