From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: What's in git.git Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <7vpsh75lx1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060618130837.GN2609@pasky.or.cz> <7vy7vta9ae.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Petr Baudis , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 19 10:35:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FsFE3-0005Gl-39 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:35:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932330AbWFSIfJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 04:35:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932327AbWFSIfJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 04:35:09 -0400 Received: from wrzx28.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de ([132.187.3.28]:1949 "EHLO mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932330AbWFSIfH (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2006 04:35:07 -0400 Received: from virusscan.mail (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F0AD29; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virusscan.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1A4D0C; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:35:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dumbo2 (wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.25.13]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816C1B68; Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:35:06 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: gene099@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vy7vta9ae.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-wuerzburg.de Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Petr Baudis writes: > > > Dear diary, on Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 02:26:14PM CEST, I got a letter > > where Johannes Schindelin said that... > > > >> Note that this issue is orthogonal to the need for a user-specific config > >> file. I still think that this one should go in. > > > > I agree as well. > > OK, let's have it then. > > Johannes, this makes your earlier ~/.gitconfig and --no-local > patches no longer applicable, so I'd drop them from "pu" for > now. But I suspect we do want to have per user configuration > that is used as a fallback for per repo configuration, right? I'll redo the patches, then. Ciao, Dscho