From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Tool renames? was Re: First stab at glossary Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <200509050054.j850sC3D023778@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <46a038f90509051713389c62c8@mail.gmail.com> <7vll2atz8a.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Martin Langhoff , Horst von Brand , Daniel Barkalow , Tim Ottinger , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 06 09:59:23 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ECYMO-0004LK-Oy for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 09:59:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964772AbVIFH7E (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 03:59:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964773AbVIFH7E (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 03:59:04 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:60634 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964772AbVIFH7C (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 03:59:02 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j867wlBo005936 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:58:48 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j867wiRj022396; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 00:58:45 -0700 To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vll2atz8a.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.45__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.115 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > > The point is, naming things as being "scripts" is useful. Grep is just an > > example. Naming things as being ".pl" or ".sh" is _not_ useful. > > Sorry, but why not? What's the upside? I can point to one downside: "git". That script right now is simple. If you rewrite git-cvsimport-script from shell to perl, it looks the same to git. Linus