From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] apply.c: tolerate diff from a dirty but unchanged path Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <7vsm091887.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vk6lk5lxt.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v3bs82rwh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vis13wth4.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vpsusqxsy.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 12 18:08:37 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DhV0P-0006VH-KU for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:08:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262633AbVFLQMf (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:12:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262634AbVFLQMc (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:12:32 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:1737 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262633AbVFLQM3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:12:29 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j5CGCOjA027264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:12:24 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j5CGCNlV004613; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:12:23 -0700 To: Junio C Hamano In-Reply-To: <7vpsusqxsy.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.40__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.109 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Here is a proposed fix. This is wrong. It will make us reject all patches that don't end the magic sequence of "@@ -", ie it will make us reject pure renames etc. I'll fix it up, Linus