git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
To: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git network protocol
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:15:01 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0504291706400.30848-100000@iabervon.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0504291333550.7439@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>

On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, David Lang wrote:

> would it make sense for the network git protocol to be something along the 
> lines of
> 
> client contacts server and sends
> the tag you want to sync with (defaults to head)
> the local index file

Actually, you really want to have a bidirectional interaction, where the
client first fetches the info to determine where to start, and then goes
through the reachable space, asking for anything it doesn't already have.

(In the long run, we want to keep track of some things we already have all
of, or know we're missing, etc., so the receiver side doesn't have to
look over its whole tree.)

git already includes two versions of this protocol; the first runs against
a static HTTP server, and the second uses ssh to get a socket. At some
point, I'm going to enable these programs to read and write
.git/refs/?/? to figure out what they're supposed to get.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*


  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-29 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 124+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-26  0:41 Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks Matt Mackall
2005-04-26  1:49 ` Daniel Phillips
2005-04-26  2:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-26  2:30   ` Mike Taht
2005-04-26  3:04     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-26  4:00       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-26 11:13         ` Chris Mason
2005-04-26 15:09           ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-26 15:38             ` Chris Mason
2005-04-26 16:23               ` Magnus Damm
2005-04-26 18:18                 ` Chris Mason
2005-04-26 20:56                 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-26 21:07                   ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-26 22:50                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-26 22:56                     ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-26 23:43                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-27 15:01                         ` Florian Weimer
2005-04-27 15:13                           ` Thomas Glanzmann
2005-04-27 18:54                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-27 19:01                               ` Thomas Glanzmann
2005-04-27 19:57                                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-04-27 20:06                                   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2005-04-27 20:35                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-27 20:39                                   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2005-04-27 20:47                                   ` Florian Weimer
2005-04-27 20:55                                 ` Florian Weimer
2005-04-27 21:04                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-27 21:06                                     ` Florian Weimer
2005-04-27 21:32                                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-04-27 19:55                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-04-27  6:34                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-27 21:10                     ` Bill Davidsen
2005-04-27 21:39                       ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-26 16:42           ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-26 17:39             ` Chris Mason
2005-04-26 19:52               ` Chris Mason
2005-04-26 18:15         ` H. Peter Anvin
2005-04-26 20:30           ` Bill Davidsen
2005-04-26 16:11       ` Bill Davidsen
2005-04-26  4:01   ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-26  4:20     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-26  4:09   ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-04-26  4:22     ` Andreas Gal
2005-04-26  4:22     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29  6:01   ` Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark Matt Mackall
2005-04-29  6:40     ` Sean
2005-04-29  7:40       ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29  8:40         ` Sean
2005-04-29 14:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 15:18           ` Morten Welinder
2005-04-29 16:52             ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-02 16:10               ` Bill Davidsen
2005-05-02 19:02                 ` Sean
2005-05-02 22:02                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-02 22:30                   ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-02 22:49                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-03  0:00                       ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-03  2:48                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-03  3:29                           ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-03  4:18                             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-03  4:24                         ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-03  4:27                           ` Matt Mackall
2005-05-03  8:45                           ` Chris Wedgwood
2005-04-29 15:44           ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 15:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 17:34               ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 17:56                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 18:08                   ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 18:33                     ` Sean
2005-04-29 18:54                       ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 19:13                         ` Sean
2005-04-29 19:22                           ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 19:28                           ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 19:47                             ` Noel Maddy
2005-04-29 19:54                               ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 20:13                                 ` Andrew Timberlake-Newell
2005-04-29 20:26                                   ` Tom Lord
2005-04-29 20:57                                     ` Andrew Timberlake-Newell
2005-04-29 20:16                                 ` Morgan Schweers
2005-04-29 20:21                                 ` Noel Maddy
2005-04-29 20:42                                   ` git network protocol David Lang
2005-04-29 21:15                                     ` Daniel Barkalow [this message]
2005-04-29 20:44                                   ` Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark Tom Lord
2005-04-29 21:57                                     ` Denys Duchier
2005-04-29 20:29                                 ` Signed commit vulnerabilities? (was: Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark) Kevin Smith
2005-04-29 21:45                             ` Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark Horst von Brand
2005-05-02 21:06                               ` Tom Lord
2005-05-03  0:24                                 ` Kevin Smith
2005-05-02 16:15                           ` Bill Davidsen
2005-04-29 16:37           ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 17:09             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 19:12               ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 19:50                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 20:23                   ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 20:49                     ` Linus Torvalds
2005-04-29 21:20                       ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-29 16:46           ` Bill Davidsen
2005-04-29 20:19       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-29 22:30         ` Olivier Galibert
2005-04-29 22:47           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-29 20:30     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-29 20:39       ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-30  2:52         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-30 15:20           ` Matt Mackall
2005-04-30 16:37             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-05-02 15:49           ` Bill Davidsen
2005-05-02 16:14             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-05-03 17:40               ` Bill Davidsen
2005-05-04  2:10                 ` Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark (/usr/bin/env again) David A. Wheeler
2005-05-02 16:17             ` Mercurial 0.4b vs git patchbomb benchmark Andrea Arcangeli
2005-05-02 16:31             ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-02 17:18               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-05-02 17:32                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-02 18:17                 ` Edgar Toernig
2005-05-02 20:54                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2005-05-02 17:20               ` Ryan Anderson
2005-05-02 17:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-02 21:17               ` Kyle Moffett
2005-05-03 17:43               ` Bill Davidsen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-14  6:21 Git network protocol Josef "Jeff" Sipek
2006-08-14  6:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-08-14 23:48   ` Josef "Jeff" Sipek
2006-08-15  0:59     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-08-15  9:14       ` Josef "Jeff" Sipek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0504291706400.30848-100000@iabervon.org \
    --to=barkalow@iabervon.org \
    --cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).