From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: karsten.blees@dcon.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] update-index/diff-index: use core.preloadindex to improve performance Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:36:06 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20121102153800.GE11170@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, msysgit@googlegroups.com, pro-logic@optusnet.com.au To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Nov 13 16:36:24 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TYIXG-0005bP-OO for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:36:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751675Ab2KMPgJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:36:09 -0500 Received: from mail.dcon.de ([77.244.111.98]:24629 "EHLO MAIL.DCON.DE" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779Ab2KMPgH (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:36:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121102153800.GE11170@sigill.intra.peff.net> X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.3 September 26, 2007 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DCON14/DCon(Release 7.0.3FP1|February 24, 2008) at 13.11.2012 16:36:07, Serialize complete at 13.11.2012 16:36:07 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King wrote on 02.11.2012 16:38:00: > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:26:16AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > > > Still, I don't think we need to worry about performance regressions, > > because people who don't have a setup suitable for it will not turn on > > core.preloadindex in the first place. And if they have it on, the more > > places we use it, probably the better. > > BTW, your patch was badly damaged in transit (wrapped, and tabs > converted to spaces). I was able to fix it up, but please check your > mailer's settings. > Yes, I feared as much, that's why I included the pull URL (the company MTA only accepts outbound mail from Notes clients, sorry). Is there a policy for people with broken mailers (send patch as attachment, add pull URL more prominently, don't include plaintext patch at all...)?