From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benoit SIGOURE Subject: Re: Git User's Survey 2007 partial summary Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:57:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200708190128.43515.jnareb@gmail.com> <200708270251.05762.jnareb@gmail.com> <61e816970708262024m1cbbfd4dxfeb10b56397670b8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-85--555560651" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git discussion list To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 27 10:57:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IPaPc-00050Y-6w for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:57:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752156AbXH0I52 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:57:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752159AbXH0I52 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:57:28 -0400 Received: from 2.139.39-62.rev.gaoland.net ([62.39.139.2]:35889 "EHLO kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751620AbXH0I51 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:57:27 -0400 Received: from quanta.tsunanet.net ([82.229.223.213]) by kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.50) id 1IPaPU-0008Vc-EN; Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:57:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-85--555560651 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Aug 27, 2007, at 10:48 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 26 Aug 2007, Dan Chokola wrote: > >> On 8/26/07, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> >>> 55. Would commerical (paid) support from a support vendor be of >>> interest to you/your organization? >>> >>> Only 44 answers yes, 217 no, 126 not applicable (which was menat to >>> encompass people who do not use git for work). >> >> Are questions like this at all indicative of where Git is looking >> towards going? > > No. These questions are just questions. Git is GPLv2, and it will > probably stay that forever, so you are _free_ to start a commercial > support scheme for Git, but others are free not to choose it. > > I for one could imagine training people, and giving technical > support for > companies needing that support. You seem to imply that GPLv3 would prevent any form of commercial support for Git... Section 4 of GPLv3: "you may offer support or warranty protection for a fee." -- Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna EPITA Research and Development Laboratory --Apple-Mail-85--555560651 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) iD8DBQFG0pHswwE67wC8PUkRArG+AJ9DJ+nRTjbhjpwXSUPV3wiix1HW0ACgo+yJ oIORbKWB4nSc2BuddAyp+P0= =Cdzo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-85--555560651--