git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Schalk, Ken" <ken.schalk@intel.com>
To: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 13:15:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <EF9FEAB3A4B7D245B0801936B6EF4A2533DBB8@azsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik2op0_Cq13EGit17ja+zCdmbM6WXJ=rfhQMnOQ@mail.gmail.com>

>Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the
>SYMLINKS prereq.

Here's a third attempt with no use of symlinks in the test:

Skip the entire rename/add conflict case if the file added on the
other branch has the same contents as the file being renamed.  This
avoids giving the user an extra copy of the same file and presenting a
conflict that is confusing and pointless.

A simple test of this case has been added in
t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh.

Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com>
---
 merge-recursive.c          |    6 ++++++
 t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c
index fb6aa4a..a2fba84 100644
--- a/merge-recursive.c
+++ b/merge-recursive.c
@@ -955,6 +955,12 @@ static int process_renames(struct merge_options *o,
                                                        ren1->pair->two : NULL,
                                                        branch1 == o->branch1 ?
                                                        NULL : ren1->pair->two, 1);
+                       } else if ((dst_other.mode == ren1->pair->two->mode) &&
+                                  sha_eq(dst_other.sha1, ren1->pair->two->sha1)) {
+                               /* Added file on the other side
+                                  identical to the file being
+                                  renamed: clean merge */
+                               update_file(o, 1, ren1->pair->two->sha1, ren1->pair->two->mode, ren1_dst);
                        } else if (!sha_eq(dst_other.sha1, null_sha1)) {
                                const char *new_path;
                                clean_merge = 0;
diff --git a/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh b/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
index d541544..b23bd9f 100755
--- a/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
+++ b/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ test_expect_success 'setup 1' '
        git branch df-3 &&
        git branch remove &&
        git branch submod &&
+       git branch copy &&
+       git branch rename &&

        echo hello >>a &&
        cp a d/e &&
@@ -248,6 +250,24 @@ test_expect_success 'setup 7' '
        git commit -m "make d/ a submodule"
 '

+test_expect_success 'setup 8' '
+
+       git checkout rename &&
+       git mv a e &&
+       git add e &&
+       test_tick &&
+       git commit -m "rename a->e"
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'setup 9' '
+
+       git checkout copy &&
+       cp a e &&
+       git add e &&
+       test_tick &&
+       git commit -m "copy a->e"
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'merge-recursive simple' '

        rm -fr [abcd] &&
@@ -580,4 +600,23 @@ test_expect_failure 'merge-recursive simple w/submodule result' '
        test_cmp expected actual
 '

+test_expect_success 'merge-recursive copy vs. rename' '
+
+       git checkout -f copy &&
+       git merge rename &&
+       ( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
+       (
+               echo "100644 blob $o0   b"
+               echo "100644 blob $o0   c"
+               echo "100644 blob $o0   d/e"
+               echo "100644 blob $o0   e"
+               echo "100644 $o0 0      b"
+               echo "100644 $o0 0      c"
+               echo "100644 $o0 0      d/e"
+               echo "100644 $o0 0      e"
+       ) >expected &&
+       test_cmp expected actual
+'
+
+
 test_done
--
1.7.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-09-01 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-09 21:00 [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical Schalk, Ken
2010-08-09 21:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-08-13  1:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-08-27 22:14   ` Schalk, Ken
2010-08-28 10:12     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2010-08-31 21:05       ` Schalk, Ken
2010-09-01 20:15       ` Schalk, Ken [this message]
2010-09-03 18:29         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=EF9FEAB3A4B7D245B0801936B6EF4A2533DBB8@azsmsx503.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=ken.schalk@intel.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).