Re[2]: [PATCH] fetch: allow running as different users in shared repositories

[Vadim Zeitlin <vz-git@zeitlins.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2014 bytes --]

On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:40:47 +0100 (CET) Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:

JS> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
JS> 
JS> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 20:04:09 +0100 Johannes Schindelin wrote:
[...]
JS> > JS> That rationale makes sense to me, as does the patch.
JS> >
JS> >  Sorry for a possibly stupid question, but what is the next thing to do
JS> > now? The instructions in Documentation/SubmittingPatches indicate that I
JS> > should wait until the "list forms consensus that [...] your patch is good",
JS> > but it's not quite clear what indicates that a consensus has been reached.
JS> > Is your comment above enough or should I wait for something else? And
JS> > if/when it has been reached, do I really I need to resend the patch to
JS> > the maintainer and cc the list as written in that document? I'm a bit
JS> > surprised by this because I don't see (most) patches being resent to this
JS> > list.
JS> 
JS> My take is that this was waiting for a review, and I provided it (*not*
JS> asking for any changes), and if there are no further reviews, the patch
JS> should make it into the `pu` branch, then `next` and eventually `master`,
JS> at which point it will be slated for the next official `.0` version.
JS> 
JS> It might make sense to ask for it to be trickled down into the `maint`
JS> branch, too, in case a `v2.26.1` is released. I would be in favor of that,
JS> but would not do the asking myself ;-)

 Hello again,

 Sorry to nag, but I'd like to return to this patch[*] because it looks
like it could have fallen through the cracks: there didn't seem to be any
more comments about it, except for Johannes' positive review, but it didn't
get mentioned in any "What's cooking" threads since then neither.

[*] https://public-inbox.org/git/20200319010321.18614-1-vz-git@zeitlins.org/


 So I'd just like to ask directly, hoping that it's not inappropriate:
Junio, do I need to do anything to get this patch accepted or am I just
being too impatient?

 Thanks in advance,
VZ

[-- Attachment #2: Type: APPLICATION/PGP-SIGNATURE, Size: 196 bytes --]