From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEBB1F404 for ; Thu, 8 Mar 2018 23:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750848AbeCHXdI (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:33:08 -0500 Received: from smtp1.cs.stanford.edu ([171.64.64.25]:38186 "EHLO smtp1.cs.Stanford.EDU" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750800AbeCHXdI (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:33:08 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1621 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 18:33:08 EST Received: from theory.stanford.edu ([171.64.78.10]:43114) by smtp1.cs.Stanford.EDU with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1eu4by-0001EZ-7z; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:06:10 -0800 Received: from csilvers by theory.stanford.edu with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1eu4bJ-0007k0-71; Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:05:29 -0800 From: csilvers To: Jeff King CC: avarab@gmail.com, jrnieder@gmail.com, drizzd@aon.at, git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, stolee@gmail.com In-reply-to: <20180303051516.GE27689@sigill.intra.peff.net> (message from Jeff King on Sat, 3 Mar 2018 00:15:16 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Speed up git tag --contains References: <1307819051-25748-1-git-send-email-avarab@gmail.com> <20110706064012.GA927@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20180303051516.GE27689@sigill.intra.peff.net> Message-Id: Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 15:05:29 -0800 X-Scan-Signature: 58355bea2820b4cf9b9c8322cdf0b49d Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org } I had a few proposals over the years, but I won't even bother to dig } them up, because there's quite recent and promising work in this } area from Derrick Stolee: It sounds like the best thing to do is to wait for this, then. We managed to convert a bunch of our branches to tags, so our immediate problem has been resolved. But I'm sure it will come up again as more branches are created... carig