From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1095E1F46C for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 18:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727736AbfLTSPy (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:15:54 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com ([209.85.166.65]:33756 "EHLO mail-io1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727406AbfLTSPx (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:15:53 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id z8so10316347ioh.0 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:15:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IpGKEOPcv39kT87rr3G2khvKUAEFncKAiWEQ9ngxIrw=; b=OhGfmU/FmJSM8iWCu40eNZ20WaQiaizcjn0pTFXtI1QQ08ymUnwUSDLJfXUxMtXriX LrKcT1uJTZM3141WTp7vwLPZvkP1x9q6v5y74VzrdIysEpXoD75yiseEMogim5GXdp12 08DIH6MUz2tOxN2FwoK2ChO3T3l9IlVFXU5a8Wvx87cArobh4bCxZj9ZtI6V/dtZudi0 0v0ye5dgFaE4EKULLTINtbN2tUWJe3S4Q9IfhfnjrzEem8lUmRZoIc+R4NY5ttXPIBte BlWX6sfW5AhBzwx/vJdwCIp7BCyd6T7CC28Yk+H2jUchyhpm3yyLE05hbH2/B57vjou2 O98Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVlQ6XUqA6ew0gl6mIy7hpu3cgOvTZd83YXXldUv9GKKnlV447R hv31UH69m6q40iR9VmSx97lgWRhy/i7lBieonipWCWK8 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw7SOvOQtUodB4UeA0btzSXRrTOB9KgPLXG44rgt0pvGzd8c2wLCYCoybc9469h4eLvbMxppz26KnsXxVU1BGM= X-Received: by 2002:a02:ba91:: with SMTP id g17mr13576331jao.106.1576865752690; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:15:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191219015833.49314-1-emaste@FreeBSD.org> <20191220153814.54899-1-emaste@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:15:40 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sparse-checkout: improve OS ls compatibility To: Eric Sunshine Cc: git mailing list , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , Junio C Hamano , Eric Wong Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 12:55, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > It would be helpful, therefore, > to mention such an implementation by name: > > ...some 'ls' implementations, such as on FreeBSD, include... > > (One can, of course, always argue that the commit message can be > consulted to learn about a particular 'ls' implementation, but then > why have an in-code comment at all?) It could serve as a hint to check the commit history, but fair enough - I agree including the specific example is an improvement. I can resend if necessary but probably that change can just be folded in?