From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962C21F463 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 21:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727674AbfLJVFV (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:05:21 -0500 Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com ([209.85.166.67]:33943 "EHLO mail-io1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727002AbfLJVFU (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:05:20 -0500 Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id z193so20335763iof.1 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:05:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=32s+7x7p/9vVv7y6c6iHCLoYAeC+06SyndyrK4TOLkI=; b=U2aM/oc/VogqgRTd2WnAoPeWYBw+3/gehymoaM4ojrlvli/WeScvxyHlR2urBu5ovg muAr7DxX69+z1dpTzec7AC7iMnlJYhm3ftLMWVW+a2IC2yiZDZ2vl3EsPk+uM5hNnI9a fu2Ml4USIR9uZTZn8xkWnJ79hy85mjB/4Go5nrNxmZKdK9NlU8mx7YDM+NVII0wdRiS1 6jWTRiLCX9yr9Ax5Y1RbJT/7N9BIUWhJgH8QdPSKQ+BHIjOYdIR2EED0rMQuyMrm8UkG BgsmQudC3YWA9CBTG7spl9M3YTYEKiT/fxCrPyeju7tAqN3AaTHqZhM9qWSVG1HrTCUZ snvA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+jJJdeG9SkHX82egIGk2VnWfXNpEcVfdeMaFxLm4fucaa16lB bAW3kDaEWmcKWi6OrLTGJMHZHhT7y+2o0a+PK663psfw X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8pbHsa7qsXbcxyaQpGHosdYklri0/2LteB38zzgeNsoI5x6FwTjlOCM8TmEyixEK5eUrV3EcrTk8oqmu7Y80= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:72c:: with SMTP id j12mr35292500jad.136.1576011920089; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:05:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <70575b23-6adb-a29b-8df8-f9099f86eb0e@gmail.com> <20191210205056.GA14079@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <20191210205056.GA14079@coredump.intra.peff.net> From: Ed Maste Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 12:18:51 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Could /Documentation/technical/commit-graph.txt be relicensed under a permissive license? To: Jeff King Cc: Derrick Stolee , Junio C Hamano , KOLANICH , git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee , Elijah Newren Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 15:51, Jeff King wrote: > > That's my understanding as well. That said, I would not be opposed to > some kind of statement in the documentation making our view explicit. As someone with a vested interest in permissively licensed tools that can perform some basic git-compatible operations, such a statement would be appreciated.