From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A441F404 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 07:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726857AbeIPMoB (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2018 08:44:01 -0400 Received: from mail-qt0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:34694 "EHLO mail-qt0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726661AbeIPMoB (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Sep 2018 08:44:01 -0400 Received: by mail-qt0-f193.google.com with SMTP id m13-v6so12629718qth.1 for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 00:22:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NgKVuYFU7qyvm0Sf7Y3thL6ddZ4kShxq+T984HCl26s=; b=lXZTxOkCtW0D1h+YWFrXnGTrPEJeX1k92AHTcLL30uZzd38VLB0RzFMh0gUHfQX+qi +KH5lalkWB7iJybHef7nuXjMib1Q2q4sNlKSe7T/+FWxxGv5WgCu8jZhnA4WId6MpvLh TPiUu77RMpd8f6TXATpLehq7+5AAbvdlFRiw6oqbjR4Mj33GHNuvW1OHhsurjMj1hKZ3 nSd7QujJBjV9WaxsTXi44YNL5vo0uI+zP49UxiGiNZaynnGEeUhB269dRN6E0UlruTHz dJuy7iLvGvqb0uai0vSjOCVpLW+oZDZMMftvBkvT1dTE7J0iuj7sBc7VPxc9zVUBP9i1 xmlg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DBeD795uh1LfZQUAm8jDpt+o1wv9g8KQgP59unhnbVdzSAKUsQ ggZjseaX3bNQaX+fFMcJO+sXhrFIapabu3rSJbywMg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYdH6+3PeE98cNOlioRs7gbJt8Xq2nO3HiTjBzCmAekA98UTEC+/AwxfFBisvK13VNW3RuVWmnnces97+T8gqU= X-Received: by 2002:aed:304b:: with SMTP id 69-v6mr13489148qte.220.1537082521972; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 00:22:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180905085427.4099-1-timschumi@gmx.de> <20180907224430.23859-1-timschumi@gmx.de> <20180907224430.23859-3-timschumi@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: From: Eric Sunshine Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 03:21:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] t0014: Introduce alias testing suite To: timschumi@gmx.de Cc: Git List , Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , =?UTF-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41jIER1eQ==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:12 PM Tim Schumacher wrote: > This is the first multi-patch series that I submitted, so I'm unsure if I > should send the updated patch only or if I should send the complete series > again as v5. Any pointers to what the correct procedure for this case is would > be appreciated. Re-send the entire series as v5. That makes it easier on reviewers (who don't need to go searching through the mailing list archive to get a full picture) and reduces Junio's workload since it's usually easier for him to re-queue a series wholesale than having to slice-and-dice some replacement patches into what was already queued.