Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] ci: avoid brew for installing perforce

[Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>]

On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:26 AM Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón
<carenas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perfoce's cask in brew is meant[1] to be used only by humans, so replace
> its use from the CI with a scripted binary download which is less likely
> to fail, as it is done in Linux.

s/Perfoce/Perforce/

> Kept the logic together so it will be less likely to break when moved
> around as on the fly code changes in this area are settled, at which
> point it will also feasable to ammend it to avoid some of the hardcoded
> values by using similar variables to the ones Linux does.

s/Kept/Keep/
s/also/also be/
s/feasable/feasible/
s/ammend/amend/

> In that same line, a POSIX sh syntax is used instead of the similar one
> used in Linux in preparation for an unrelated future change that might
> change the shell currently configured for it.
>
> This change reintroduces the risk that the installed binaries might not
> work because of being quarantined that was fixed with 5ed9fc3fc86 (ci:
> prevent `perforce` from being quarantined, 2020-02-27) but fixing that
> now was also punted for simplicity and since the affected cloud provider
> is scheduled to be retired with an on the fly change, but should be
> addressed if that other change is not integrated further.
>
> The discussion on the need to keep 2 radically different versions of
> the binaries to be tested with Linux vs macOS or how to upgrade to
> newer versions now that brew won't do that automatically for us has
> been punted for now as well.  On that line the now obsolete comment
> about it in lib.sh was originally being updated by this change but
> created conflicts as it is moved around by other on the fly changes,
> so will be addressed independently as well.
>
> [1] https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-cask/pull/122347#discussion_r856026584
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>