From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/21] t/test-lib-functions.sh: generalize test_cmp_rev
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 20:07:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cSQtnk3wXg6agkHPgYzV-gV_cWv8G0rUO9NZCFxsZC5EA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460294354-7031-4-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net>
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> wrote:
> test_cmp_rev() took exactly two parameters, the expected revision
> and the revision to test. This commit generalizes this function
> such that it takes any number of at least two revisions: the
> expected one and a list of actual ones. The function returns true
> if and only if at least one actual revision coincides with the
> expected revision.
>
> While at it, the side effect of generating two (temporary) files
> is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
> ---
> diff --git a/t/test-lib-functions.sh b/t/test-lib-functions.sh
> @@ -711,11 +711,17 @@ test_must_be_empty () {
> -# Tests that its two parameters refer to the same revision
> +# Tests that the first parameter refers to the same revision
> +# of at least one other parameter
> test_cmp_rev () {
> - git rev-parse --verify "$1" >expect.rev &&
> - git rev-parse --verify "$2" >actual.rev &&
> - test_cmp expect.rev actual.rev
> + hash1="$(git rev-parse --verify "$1")" || return
> + shift
> + for rev
> + do
> + hash2="$(git rev-parse --verify "$rev")" || return
> + test "$hash1" = "$hash2" && return 0
> + done
> + return 1
> }
The original code printed helpful diagnostic information when the
comparison failed, but the new code does not. Is this intentional?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-11 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-10 13:18 [PATCH v2 00/21] git bisect improvements Stephan Beyer
2016-04-10 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] bisect: write about `bisect next` in documentation Stephan Beyer
2016-04-10 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] bisect: allow 'bisect run' if no good commit is known Stephan Beyer
2016-04-10 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] t/test-lib-functions.sh: generalize test_cmp_rev Stephan Beyer
2016-04-11 0:07 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2016-04-15 20:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-24 19:51 ` Stephan Beyer
2016-04-25 18:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] t: use test_cmp_rev() where appropriate Stephan Beyer
2016-04-11 0:07 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-15 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] t6030: generalize test to not rely on current implementation Stephan Beyer
2016-04-10 13:47 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2016-04-10 19:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 19:37 ` Stephan Beyer
2016-04-11 0:23 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-15 21:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:18 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] bisect: add test for the bisect algorithm Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 21:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] bisect: plug the biggest memory leak Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 21:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] bisect: make bisect compile if DEBUG_BISECT is set Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 21:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] bisect: make algorithm behavior independent of DEBUG_BISECT Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] bisect: get rid of recursion in count_distance() Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] bisect: use struct node_data array instead of int array Stephan Beyer
2016-04-12 23:02 ` Christian Couder
2016-04-15 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] bisect: replace clear_distance() by unique markers Stephan Beyer
2016-04-12 23:20 ` Christian Couder
2016-04-15 22:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] bisect: use commit instead of commit list as arguments when appropriate Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 22:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] bisect: extract get_distance() function from code duplication Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 22:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] bisect: introduce distance_direction() Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 22:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] bisect: make total number of commits global Stephan Beyer
2016-04-13 13:23 ` Christian Couder
2016-04-15 22:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-16 0:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] bisect: rename count_distance() to compute_weight() Stephan Beyer
2016-04-13 13:32 ` Christian Couder
2016-04-15 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] bisect: prepare for different algorithms based on find_all Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 22:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:19 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] bisect: use a bottom-up traversal to find relevant weights Stephan Beyer
2016-04-13 14:11 ` Christian Couder
2016-04-15 22:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-15 22:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-26 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] bisect: compute best bisection in compute_relevant_weights() Stephan Beyer
2016-04-10 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] bisect: get back halfway shortcut Stephan Beyer
2016-04-15 22:53 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPig+cSQtnk3wXg6agkHPgYzV-gV_cWv8G0rUO9NZCFxsZC5EA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=s-beyer@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).