From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Stefan Beller" <sbeller@google.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH 04/11] upload-pack-2: Implement the version 2 of upload-pack
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 13:30:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cSFEN+V0668FPDM1jY2KdW_nVaEn7+AOWJj_KwUU_UVPw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150527063558.GB885@peff.net>
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:01:08PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
>> +static void send_capabilities(void)
>> +{
>> + char buf[100];
>> +
>> + while (next_capability(buf))
>> + packet_write(1, "capability:%s\n", buf);
>
> Like Eric, I find the whole next_capability thing a little ugly. His
> suggestion to pass in the parsing state is an improvement, but I wonder
> why we need to parse at all. Can we keep the capabilities as:
>
> const char *capabilities[] = {
> "multi_ack",
> "thin-pack",
> ... etc ...
> };
>
> and then loop over the array?
Yes, that would be much nicer. I also had this in mind but didn't know
if there was a strong reason for the capabilities to be shoehorned
into a single string as they are currently.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-26 22:01 [RFC/WIP PATCH 00/11] Protocol version 2, again! Stefan Beller
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 01/11] upload-pack: make client capability parsing code a separate function Stefan Beller
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 02/11] upload-pack: only accept capabilities on the first "want" line Stefan Beller
2015-05-26 22:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-26 22:20 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 03/11] upload-pack: move capabilities out of send_ref Stefan Beller
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 04/11] upload-pack-2: Implement the version 2 of upload-pack Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 2:30 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-05-27 6:35 ` Jeff King
2015-05-27 17:30 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2015-05-27 20:14 ` Jeff King
2015-05-27 17:40 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 20:34 ` Jeff King
2015-05-27 20:45 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 21:46 ` Jeff King
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 05/11] transport: add infrastructure to support a protocol version number Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 6:39 ` Jeff King
2015-05-27 19:01 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 20:17 ` Jeff King
2015-05-27 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 06/11] remote.h: add get_remote_capabilities, request_capabilities Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 3:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-05-27 6:50 ` Jeff King
2015-05-27 17:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-05-27 20:09 ` Jeff King
2015-05-27 6:45 ` Jeff King
2015-05-29 19:39 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-29 22:08 ` Jeff King
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 07/11] fetch-pack: use the configured transport protocol Stefan Beller
2015-05-26 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-26 22:23 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 6:53 ` Jeff King
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 08/11] transport: connect_setup appends protocol version number Stefan Beller
2015-05-26 22:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-26 22:31 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 5:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-27 6:56 ` Jeff King
2015-05-27 3:33 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-05-27 7:02 ` Jeff King
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 09/11] transport: get_refs_via_connect exchanges capabilities before refs Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 5:37 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-05-27 7:06 ` Jeff King
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 10/11] t5544: add a test case for the new protocol Stefan Beller
2015-05-27 5:34 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-05-27 7:12 ` Jeff King
2015-05-26 22:01 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 11/11] Document protocol version 2 Stefan Beller
2015-05-29 20:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-29 21:36 ` Stefan Beller
2015-05-29 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-29 22:21 ` Jeff King
2015-06-01 23:14 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-01 23:40 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-04 13:18 ` Jeff King
2015-06-04 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-02 17:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-27 6:18 ` [RFC/WIP PATCH 00/11] Protocol version 2, again! Jeff King
2015-05-27 7:08 ` Jeff King
2015-06-01 17:49 ` Stefan Beller
2015-06-02 10:10 ` Duy Nguyen
2015-06-04 13:09 ` Jeff King
2015-06-04 16:44 ` Stefan Beller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPig+cSFEN+V0668FPDM1jY2KdW_nVaEn7+AOWJj_KwUU_UVPw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=sbeller@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).