git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
	"Shourya Shukla" <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] test_cmp: diagnose incorrect arguments
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 02:06:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRqnRKUdmwX3K+hbYs8+T0CCpatkPi4T-bu8ofH6jTnNg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqy2k5931k.fsf@gitster.c.googlers.com>

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 7:14 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> >  test_cmp() {
> > -     test $# -eq 2 || BUG "test_cmp requires two arguments"
> > -     if ! eval "$GIT_TEST_CMP" '"$@"'
>
> Looking at this again, I think we could keep the "we should have two
> arguments, no more than, no less than, but exactly two".  But I think
> those who write new tests are working to eventually make them pass,
> so hopefully they'll notice and investigate test_cmp that yields false
> anyway, I guess.

The purpose of the change in question[1] was specifically to help
catch bugs in the test_expect_failure() case, which is quite rare in
the Git test suite (and hopefully becomes rarer over time). So, I
think it's fine to revert the change fully, including the 2-argument
check since, as you say, test writers are normally trying to make
their tests pass, and the 2-argument check doesn't provide much, if
any, value for the test_expect_success() case.

[1]: d572f52a64 (test_cmp: diagnose incorrect arguments, 2020-08-09)

      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-17  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-09  6:08 [PATCH] test_cmp: diagnose incorrect arguments Eric Sunshine
2020-08-09  8:32 ` Shourya Shukla
2020-08-09  8:49   ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-09 17:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Eric Sunshine
2020-08-09 19:12   ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-09 19:34     ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-10 15:22       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-08-11 18:32   ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-11 19:25     ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-11 21:03       ` Taylor Blau
2020-08-12 15:37       ` Jeff King
2020-08-12 16:15         ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-12 16:39           ` Eric Sunshine
2020-08-12 17:10             ` Jeff King
2020-10-16  0:17   ` Jeff King
2020-10-16  2:18     ` Eric Sunshine
2020-10-16 18:36       ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-16 20:56         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-16 23:14           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-10-17  6:06             ` Eric Sunshine [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPig+cRqnRKUdmwX3K+hbYs8+T0CCpatkPi4T-bu8ofH6jTnNg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).