From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Rafael Silva <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] worktree: teach `list --porcelain` to annotate locked worktree
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:16:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRZCfuhdX7O4RFLbzxoOeQF1BEopjJM=3SfuuEd+cCEMw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gohp6kbldlfkig.fsf@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 3:20 AM Rafael Silva
<rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com> wrote:
> Eric Sunshine writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 6:43 PM Rafael Silva
> > <rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> + quote_c_style(reason, &sb, NULL, CQUOTE_NODQ);
> >
> > This needs a change, and it's totally my fault that it does. In my
> > previous review, I mentioned that if the lock reason contains special
> > characters, we want those special characters escaped and the reason
> > quoted, but _only_ if it contains special characters. However, I then
> > incorrectly said to call quote_c_style() with CQUOTE_NODQ to achieve
> > that behavior. In fact, CQUOTE_NODQ gives us the wrong behavior since
> > it avoids quoting the string which, as Phillip pointed out, makes it
> > impossible to distinguish between a string which just happens to
> > contain the two-character sequence '\' and 'n', and an escaped newline
> > "\n". So, the above should really be:
> >
> Alright, I believe I've got the whole picture now and sorry for the
> confusion. You and Phillip clearly stated in the review cycle that the
> reason should be quoted because of the aforementioned reasons and I
> dropped when I was working on this version.
It was my fault by confusing you with the misleading mention of CQUOTE_NODQ.
> >> + git worktree add --detach locked1 &&
> >> + git worktree add --detach locked2 &&
> >> + git worktree add --detach unlocked &&
> >
> > So, the purpose of the `unlocked` worktree in this test is to prove
> > that it didn't accidentally get annotated with `locked`? (Since, if it
> > did get annotated, then `actual` would contain too many lines and not
> > match `expect`.) Is that correct?
>
> Yes, this is what I intended to check when adding the `unlocked`
> worktree. I'm considering how to make this more explicit so it's clear
> for readers why the `unlocked` worktree exists in this test.
A simple in-code comment should suffice, I would think:
git worktree add --detach locked1 &&
git worktree add --detach locked2 &&
# unlocked worktree should not be annotated "locked"
git worktree add --detach unlocked &&
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 16:21 [PATCH 0/7] teach `worktree list` verbose mode and prunable annotations Rafael Silva
2021-01-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] worktree: move should_prune_worktree() to worktree.c Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 5:58 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:40 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 6:55 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-07 7:24 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:41 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] worktree: implement worktree_prune_reason() wrapper Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 7:08 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:42 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] worktree: teach worktree_lock_reason() to gently handle main worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 7:29 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:43 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 4/7] worktree: teach `list` prunable annotation and verbose Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 8:31 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:45 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 5/7] worktree: `list` escape lock reason in --porcelain Rafael Silva
2021-01-05 10:29 ` Phillip Wood
2021-01-05 11:02 ` [PATCH] worktree: add -z option for list subcommand Phillip Wood
2021-01-07 3:34 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 10:33 ` Phillip Wood
2021-01-10 7:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-06 9:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] worktree: `list` escape lock reason in --porcelain Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:47 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 8:59 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] worktree: add tests for `list` verbose and annotations Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 9:39 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-07 4:09 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:49 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-04 16:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] worktree: document `list` verbose and prunable annotations Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 9:57 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:49 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-06 5:36 ` [PATCH 0/7] teach `worktree list` verbose mode " Eric Sunshine
2021-01-08 7:38 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-08 8:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] " Rafael Silva
2021-01-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] worktree: libify should_prune_worktree() Rafael Silva
2021-01-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] worktree: teach worktree to lazy-load "prunable" reason Rafael Silva
2021-01-18 2:57 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-19 7:57 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] worktree: teach worktree_lock_reason() to gently handle main worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] worktree: teach `list --porcelain` to annotate locked worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-18 3:55 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-19 8:20 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 17:16 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2021-01-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] worktree: teach `list` to annotate prunable worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-18 4:45 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-19 10:26 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 17:23 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-17 23:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] worktree: teach `list` verbose mode Rafael Silva
2021-01-18 5:15 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-18 19:40 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-18 5:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] teach `worktree list` verbose mode and prunable annotations Eric Sunshine
2021-01-19 16:44 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] " Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] worktree: libify should_prune_worktree() Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] worktree: teach worktree to lazy-load "prunable" reason Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] worktree: teach worktree_lock_reason() to gently handle main worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] t2402: ensure locked worktree is properly cleaned up Rafael Silva
2021-01-24 7:50 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-24 10:19 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] worktree: teach `list --porcelain` to annotate locked worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-20 11:00 ` Phillip Wood
2021-01-21 3:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-21 15:25 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-24 8:24 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-24 8:10 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-24 10:20 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-19 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] worktree: teach `list` to annotate prunable worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-21 3:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-21 15:09 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-21 22:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-19 21:27 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] worktree: teach `list` verbose mode Rafael Silva
2021-01-24 8:42 ` Eric Sunshine
2021-01-24 10:21 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-24 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] teach `worktree list` verbose mode and prunable annotations Eric Sunshine
2021-01-27 8:08 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-27 8:03 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-27 8:03 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] worktree: libify should_prune_worktree() Rafael Silva
2021-01-27 8:03 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] worktree: teach worktree to lazy-load "prunable" reason Rafael Silva
2021-01-27 8:03 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] worktree: teach worktree_lock_reason() to gently handle main worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-27 8:03 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] t2402: ensure locked worktree is properly cleaned up Rafael Silva
2021-01-27 8:03 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] worktree: teach `list --porcelain` to annotate locked worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-27 8:03 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] worktree: teach `list` to annotate prunable worktree Rafael Silva
2021-01-27 8:03 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] worktree: teach `list` verbose mode Rafael Silva
2021-01-30 7:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] teach `worktree list` verbose mode and prunable annotations Eric Sunshine
2021-01-30 9:42 ` Rafael Silva
2021-01-30 17:50 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPig+cRZCfuhdX7O4RFLbzxoOeQF1BEopjJM=3SfuuEd+cCEMw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=rafaeloliveira.cs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).