From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>,
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prune: mark rebase autostash and orig-head as reachable
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:25:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRASFkTD6=YumZJKv7XJjr1asxKB-mAyBFox8tuwmNnFw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1656.git.1707411636382.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 12:00 PM Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
<gitgitgadget@gmail.com> wrote:
> Rebase records the oid of HEAD before rebasing and the commit created by
> "--autostash" in files in the rebase state directory. This means that
> the autostash commit is never reachable from any ref or reflog and when
> rebasing a detached HEAD the original HEAD can become unreachable if the
> user expires HEAD's the reflog while the rebase is running. Fix this by
> reading the relevant files when marking reachable commits.
>
> Note that it is possible for the commit recorded in
> .git/rebase-merge/amend to be unreachable but pruning that object does
> not affect the operation of "git rebase --continue" as we're only
> interested in the object id, not in the object itself.
>
> Reported-by: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
> ---
> diff --git a/reachable.c b/reachable.c
> @@ -30,6 +31,53 @@ static void update_progress(struct connectivity_progress *cp)
> +static int add_one_file(const char *path, struct rev_info *revs)
> +{
> + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> + if (!read_oneliner(&buf, path, READ_ONELINER_SKIP_IF_EMPTY)) {
> + strbuf_release(&buf);
> + return 0;
> + }
> + strbuf_trim(&buf);
> + if (!get_oid_hex(buf.buf, &oid)) {
> + object = parse_object_or_die(&oid, buf.buf);
> + add_pending_object(revs, object, "");
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
Is this leaking the strbuf? Should the function instead end with:
strbuf_release(&buf);
return 0;
Also, what is the significance of the return value of this function?
All code paths seem to be returning 0 unconditionally, and the caller
ignores the return value.
> +/* Mark objects recored in rebase state files as reachable. */
s/recored/recorded/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 17:00 [PATCH] prune: mark rebase autostash and orig-head as reachable Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2024-02-08 17:25 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2024-02-09 11:08 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-08 18:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-09 14:15 ` Phillip Wood
2024-02-09 16:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2024-02-09 18:04 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPig+cRASFkTD6=YumZJKv7XJjr1asxKB-mAyBFox8tuwmNnFw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=orgads@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).